The Explosif has had sliding dropouts since 2004, and I guess with a marginal model in an area where there's quite a lot of SS interest, it's unrealistic to think it wouldn't have. How much that adds to the weight I don't know, but it must contribute something to the Explosif having grown to around 5lbs by 2007.Geoff":1trluz3l said:Indeed, had noticed that. Somebody in the other thread was bemoaning the Explosif being turned into a sliding dropout beefcake thingy, and I agree.
Plastic comment was tongue in cheek, but I stand by it...always liked the fact that the Kil was never remade into alu/scan versions like the Caldera, Explosif (at one point), Hei Hei and so on. Kilauea meant (good) steel. Now it doesn't, necessarily.
Steel I like, but a 5lb all-rounder doesn't really live up to the meaning of the Explosif name IMO. When the Explosif first came out, it was a race bike, as fast as anything on the course, and that justified the name. But really since the 1997 Columbus Max frames, the scandium Explosifs of 2000/01 are the only ones that have passed the 'it does what it says on the tin' test.
Now they have a 2.4lb carbon race frame, and I would say that lives up to the name Explosif, but they've decided to call it Kilauea. BITD, Kilaueas were essentially the same quality as Explosifs and essentially the same weight, but less racy, less stiff, more compliant. You pays your money and you takes your choice, but I was just highlighting the reversal of roles.
Now would I prefer a 2.4lb Kilauea or a 5lb Explosif? Hmmm, unfortunately I shall never know, as I can't afford to find out whether I like the ride of a carbon frame. All I can afford is retro, and I'll continue to enjoy that but (unlike you perhaps Mr Rymer), I wouldn't say no if someone offered me one of those reborn Kilaueas.