Re:
Don't be an "Amber Gambler" you fools. Is it time to reinstate the Tufty club or maybe even the Green Cross Code Man?
This is the 3rd woman killed in London by stepping out into the path of a cyclist and other traffic, of recent. I think there needs to be a serious concerted national programme of re-education of all road users, particularly of those on foot.
The high profile prosecution in the Briggs vs Alliston case represents a sea change in the way cyclists are now viewed and negatively represented in the media. A lady in her 60s was killed stepping into the path of a cyclist (injured) on a section of the RideLondon event. Following this third death yesterday evening, the 'cyclist' involved was arrested at the scene but on charges unrelated to the collision incident. But the way it was reported was very loaded and leading (even misleading) and very much a mis-representation of cyclists as a whole.
Oxford Street, where it happened, is a little slice of hell. It's virtually a narrow cramped mile-long shopping arcade that's furiously busy with shoppers and commuters barging along the pavements and stepping randomly into its two lanes filled with black cabs and the 'red wall' of London buses. Every few hundred yards, the street is bisected with side streets of traffic leaping across the main drag. It's a health and safety nightmare gone bad. Many people (pedestrians and cyclists) have been hit by the numerous buses on it but generally these incidents are under reported.
What strikes me now is that there has been a mood change since the Briggs vs Alliston case and a shift in attitude towards cyclists. You can almost see it in the eyes of people who defiantly step out in front of you, almost willing you to crash into them, like they now know the law and public opinion is on their side. I really worry now.