bigdawg":36loads9 said:Secondly why does everyone think wales is a better place...
Open your minds a bit here guys it is a good xc race course, which is exactly what its designed for...
sinnerman":3ojb7m2l said:mate, peoples opinions are based on what has been seen so far. and thats a short video, and the video, hasnt done it any favours.
Drencrom":1cgo352w said:bigdawg":1cgo352w said:Secondly why does everyone think wales is a better place...
Open your minds a bit here guys it is a good xc race course, which is exactly what its designed for...
Because the Olympics are an exhibition and a legacy for the country they are held in. Not sure that course will inspire many, unlike a course designed to showcase some of the natural beauty and terrain that the UK has to offer, both to current and prospective riders.
The idea of getting the Olympics to London, and therefore the UK was, as far as I was aware - and I'm very happy to be corrected here - to promote the UK and to promote the idea of sport as a way of life - a lasting legacy.
who is the best of the best.
MikeD":3tku2f44 said:who is the best of the best.
Regardless of what anyone thinks of the course, they will all be racing on the same one, so that's that box ticked
MikeD":1zhf1lfc said:Many XC races have been pretty much exactly that. At least this one has some vaguely technical bits, however contrived (and of arguable challenge) they may be. It's notoriously hard to tell how tricky a trail is from photos or video, although a couple of those sections look on a par with bits of Dalby that some of the pros struggled with at the World Cup.