highlandsflyer
Retro Wizard
- Feedback
- View
KeepItSteel":3dclbmr3 said:The lad is just 25. Perhaps you know something the world at large is ignorant about? Is he about to retire?
The way I see it, Federer is soon out. That leaves Andy at, say 27, with a a few more years in the game with a clearer shot at finals. No reason at all he cannot capitalise on one of those that happen to be slams.
Whilst I can see sense in the theory that Andy may get lucky and win a slam by virtue of default once the other top players get too old/injured etc (what a thing to pin your hopes on)
I don't think Murray is pinning his hopes on Federer retiring; but it is an obvious prospect.
Murray should have every reason to hope for a career as long as Federer's. This should mean a stretch clear of one of his major rivals.
That kind of succession occurs naturally in most sports.
The Jimmy White analogy is not really appropriate, as he won just about everything except the world championships, which in Tennis terms does not exist as such in one tournament.
My all time favourite tennis player is McEnroe. Who gives a fig about being 'nice'?