one-eyed_jim
Old School Grand Master
Not at all. I'm very aware of it. But we can't and shouldn't assume that our own choices should be applied to others. Life is for living, and living entails risk.sastusbulbas":18qf4vle said:You seem to be forgetting the predicament you may be putting someone else in.
It's a possible scenario, but kids are tough, and they learn from their mistakes. What about the hypothetical kid who comes to love mountain biking by watching your helmeted example, takes a rough descent, helmeted, a little too fast, and ends up in a wheelchair?Or kids seeing an adult riding trails and jumps with no helmet, lets say that influence leaves the helmet their parent bought at the side of a jump, and the kid hurts his head, I feel it is part of social responsibility to set an example.
Now, I didn't say anything about jumping helmetless.
I agree, which is another reason I object to the suggestion that it's a no-brainer. We just don't have the data.A lot of this does not seem to be tested against or have any proven protection. I remember seeing early tests which involved an impact straight on top of the helmet,which is nothing like an abrasive sideways impact with weight and leverage at speed.
I'm more than happy for you to hold that opinion.Personally I still believe for the majority of riders and rider environments that a decent bicycle helmet is a good and responsible habit.