kd498":3tbje06v said:
Think my Seiko 5 gains as well.misteroo":2fic52gj said:kd498":2fic52gj said:
WOW....love the modded ones.
Here's mine...wear it everyday, but I think it's gaining about a minute every month ish!!
I've got family living in China, who has the same Seiko 5 as me (no surprise, really, since he bought me mine), and he had it regulated over there. He said he took it to a "watch guy" (business, though, not acquaintance / enthusiastic amateur) who put it on some machine, which presumably told him something, then took the back off, tinkered, and now gets surprisingly decent timekeeping from it.misteroo":2fic52gj said:Who could sort that for me and change the glass for a nice sapphire crystal dome??
misteroo":3pb6xi1h said:Here's mine...wear it everyday, but I think it's gaining about a minute every month ish!!
Who could sort that for me and change the glass for a nice sapphire crystal dome??
Neil":3pb6xi1h said:I've got family living in China, who has the same Seiko 5 as me (no surprise, really, since he bought me mine), and he had it regulated over there. He said he took it to a "watch guy" (business, though, not acquaintance / enthusiastic amateur) who put it on some machine, which presumably told him something, then took the back off, tinkered, and now gets surprisingly decent timekeeping from it.
I think you need a very steady hand, and a decent mix of caution and chutzpah to do it yourself. I've often thought about regulating mine, then considered the yips, and decided it's not broken enough to warrant my fixing.
lrh":39u6zf1i said:I've only got two mechanical watches but the Rolex method of making a small correction each night works well. I assume it works equally well on a Seiko?
I've read about the sensitivity of the regulator arm, and that, and a propensity for the yips has made me reluctant to mess with it - much the same as not wanting to take on changing the generator on one of my Kinetics.Fudd":3o3w0eas said:The machine you refer to is a timegrapher and its probably best not to try and regulate it unless you or your watchmaker has one. The main reason being that there are two adjustment levers, one for the speed and another for the beat error and you need to get the beat error adjusted first before you tackle the rate or speed of the watch, otherwise the timekeeping will always be inconsistent. In my experience a new 7S26 can vary by up to 20spd depending on the position it is placed in so a timegrapher will only get you in the ball park and further adjustments may be necessary after a day or two on the wrist. If the beat error is less than 0.2ms and its running within 5 seconds per day on the wrist then thats probably as good as it'll get. To slow or increase the speed of the movement by 10spd requires the very slightest of touches on the regulator arm and if you see it move then you've moved it too far, and that's working with 2.5x magnification. Here's a pic of the last 6309 I serviced on the timegrapher -Neil":3o3w0eas said:I've got family living in China, who has the same Seiko 5 as me (no surprise, really, since he bought me mine), and he had it regulated over there. He said he took it to a "watch guy" (business, though, not acquaintance / enthusiastic amateur) who put it on some machine, which presumably told him something, then took the back off, tinkered, and now gets surprisingly decent timekeeping from it.
I think you need a very steady hand, and a decent mix of caution and chutzpah to do it yourself. I've often thought about regulating mine, then considered the yips, and decided it's not broken enough to warrant my fixing.