- Feedback
- View
Defo a 90 as the 89 had a different groupset and the 91 a different colour. The 91 Bolinas Ridge was this colour but with Suntour parts. The U-Brake is because of the size as all small 90's had them, including my mates Palisades bitd.
I actually found a post you made about that in a thread on upgrading Muirwoods.It took me a while to date it and I'm still not 100% sure 1990 is correct. It's pretty much on the back burner for now, waiting for some warm dry weather so I can touch in the paintwork.
Thinking about giving it a full upgrade, got a lovely mixed 400/500 LX groupset in almost new condition that would be great for this, but of course a catalogue correct resto still favourite.
Completely agree about the wheels and will definitely stick with the originals, they're in superb shape as are the tyres. 100/200GS though is a pretty dire groupset being as it is bottom of the range, but these framesets are far from dire, sure they are relatively heavy but the steel is of good quality, they are solidly built and even with the shitty groupset (and no brakes) mine was a hoot to ride, not to mention the fluro paint job is far too good to waste on substandard parts.I actually found a post you made about that in a thread on upgrading Muirwoods.
Funny, I also have a complete bike's worth of 90 and 91 LX and 400LX and am pretty sure I am just going to replace the exage trail and country stuff it came with. It was all plastic anyway, and a few things were broken. Buying used exage trail stuff on ebay for more than the price of the whole bike, just to maintain the originality, seems not worth it.
I would like to reuse the wheels, though, and so might stay with a six freewheel, and would have to figure out the shifters then. It has 130mm spacing, and I need to test mount a seven speed 135. I'm not worried about cold setting it if I have to, but the Araya/Joytrch/Solid axle combo is kinda cool.
The upper end Shimano stuff is undeniably nicer, and I go that way whenever I can, but I have to admit that Shimano did a good job making their lower end stuff more than decent.Completely agree about the wheels and will definitely stick with the originals, they're in superb shape as are the tyres. 100/200GS though is a pretty dire groupset being as it is bottom of the range, but these framesets are far from dire, sure they are relatively heavy but the steel is of good quality, they are solidly built and even with the shitty groupset (and no brakes) mine was a hoot to ride, not to mention the fluro paint job is far too good to waste on substandard parts.
So I think they deserve the upgrade, frankly we deserve the upgrade if we're planning on riding them. I might hang on to the original stuff just in case I come to sell it and the new owner is a stickler for catalogue spec.
I suppose they were worried about the cantis hitting the rider on smaller frames? That's pretty thoughtful, really.Another small, U-Braked 90 here:
https://www.retrobike.co.uk/threads/small-marin-bear-valley-1990-warrington.441975/