The fork fitted to the 2000 Stinky is the Marzocchi Z5. That particular model and function was chosen to come within a price bracket: Quote from the Catalogue, "Stinky function without the Dee-Lux price. The tubing used on the Stinky is also lower end generic 7000 series, compared to the Easton tubing used on the Dee-Lux.
The forks fitted to the "artist impression" picture in the catalogue does have a Disc mount, so I'm not sure why your bike does not have this feature. The Catalogues are produced in the Autumn of the previous year, so your bike shouldn't for example be an early version.
http://www.retrobike.co.uk/gallery2/v/Manufacturer+Archive/Kona/Catalogues/2000/
Pip
I know, shocking prices. Looks like a batch of new old stock has been found, and as such, they are asking unobtanium type prices for them.I stand corrected. my apologies.
also, how much?
The bike in the picture is the 2000 model, and is just called the Stinky , which is the model below the Stinky Dee-lux.
The Gear Hanger looks like it will be a Kona Style "H", which can be replaced by Wheels Manufacturing No: 25.
I may have better confirmation on the Hanger, but check out the profile on the inside of the Kona "H" and Wheels Manufacturing No: 25 below and meanwhile, I will delver deeper.
View attachment 563944
View attachment 563943
Pip.
Rt on, thanks for the info. Is it worth $200 to get running/restore?The bike in the picture is the 2000 model, and is just called the Stinky , which is the model below the Stinky Dee-lux.
The Gear Hanger looks like it will be a Kona Style "H", which can be replaced by Wheels Manufacturing No: 25.
I may have better confirmation on the Hanger, but check out the profile on the inside of the Kona "H" and Wheels Manufacturing No: 25 below and meanwhile, I will delver deeper.
View attachment 563944
View attachment 563943
Pip.