- Feedback
- View
Send em back
Get a refund, wait on them being re-listed cheaper
Or buy new from a shop
G
Get a refund, wait on them being re-listed cheaper
Or buy new from a shop

G
suburbanreuben":2ypia13c said:They're listed as "New". Even his desciption of having been "used once" doesn't alter the fact that being descibed as "New" they could be expected to be in "as new" condition, not used once (for how long?) in muddy conditions. Postage cost is irrelevant; it's just one of the things you'ld ,let slide if you were otherwise happy. If you're not, it's just salt in the wound.Enid_Puceflange":2ypia13c said:Sorry,
But you bought these knowing the postage costs
I dont see why you are going to leave him neg![]()
He has replied courteously (sp) and with (what seems to me) a pretty reasonable answer
The lad sounds straight up to me
Fair enough he never sent the cables, but he's gonna
If he doesnt, then moan, but did he list them with the cables??
G
Enid_Puceflange":1pzj9itc said:Send em back
Get a refund, wait on them being re-listed cheaper
Or buy new from a shop![]()
G
sylus":uk4xekr8 said:Enid_Puceflange":uk4xekr8 said:Send em back
Get a refund, wait on them being re-listed cheaper
Or buy new from a shop![]()
G
probably the best way
if you are genuinely not happy with them return them for a refund
sylus":3d5cc8lk said:So
Morning after and hopefully a bit calmer without people goading you on... Did you leave a neg or send an email?
If not can I offer something fir consideration?
Perhaps if you were now to message him along the lines of ... Your disappointment was that the item was listed as new and it clearly wasn't and added to that the postage was nearly three times the actual cost, you feel it would not be unreasonable to send them back for a full refund
But also offer... should a refund of the postage cost be considered then this you feel would bring the matter to a close given they were in fact used and not new..... Something along those lines anyway
That's true - assuming that you're getting quality of postage commensurate with the cost. Decently and cleanly packed, at the agreed class of postage is one thing, but as I've mentioned before, top-dollar costs and scabby packaging, is a bit, well, rough.JeRkY":j90m7f2w said:In all honesty if it were just the postage you were pisses at and I were the seller I'd tell you to do one as you agreed to paythe quoted cost when you entered a bid.
To my mind, new doesn't mean used - and used for a ride where they got dirty and contaminated.JeRkY":j90m7f2w said:The fact he says they were new but then says used once is a mute point and can be debated. The fact they are full of dirt is only circumstantial evidence that they have been used for longer and doesn't rule out his story of a muddy ride.
Well in fairness, surely feedback should accurately reflect feelings on the deal - rather than being overly-sensitive as to it's implications on the sellers feedback rating. Sometimes it seems that's more important than any other aspect of feedback.JeRkY":j90m7f2w said:I think damaging some ones feedback over this is daft. If you don't like them you should of returned them as they were. Your claim would have been reasonable. To clean them and then demand postage back is in my mind unreasonable as you did not give the seller the opportunity to refund and accept a return.