"Isn't modern bicycle technology absolutely wonderful?"šŸ˜

When I grow up, I’m going to avoid posting on modern vs old threads …… but -

Went with my teenage boys to Dalby Forest and hired what I beleive are referred-to as ā€œhard-tailā€ mountain bikes (29er/27.5er, 140mm front, alloy frame, c. 14kg)

We did the 22mile , fairly technical red run. Notes:

Dropper posts are so good: hite rite!
1 x 12 works
29ers are too big to do the technical switchbacks on (with any kind of flow). The course was probably laid down in 26 era …
But they go over/ down anything.
We got overtaken by lots of e-bikes (but I wonder if they got round 22 miles on one charge). They were not cool in any way. My boys are very taken with them (Gen Z šŸ™„)
14kg bikes are very slow uphill, so spin it and have a rest.
Last time we did this run we were on light 26ā€ rigid bikes. Got round in about the same time, but were much more knackered without suspension.

I want a 10kg 26ā€ bike with some front suspension, if something like that has even been invented …
 
^^ I like doctor-bond’s post

Very much my experience of modern bikes. I’m trying to shave weight off my lardy 29er! It is is much less nimble/agile/flickable than 26, but on the techy stuff it is just so much more capable. If only there was an in-between wheel size….. :LOL:
 
Just making a list of wanted requirements while I remember:

Lightness and 26/ 27 wheels a must. High volume tyres a must - suspect a much bigger difference than a few mm on suspension travel. Brakes - you adapt to what you have.

Incidentally, flat pedals with spikes were surprisingly grippy (almost too much if you want to adjust foot position on the go) but being a child of the 80s, I’d still spec half toe clips with no straps; no slipping off the front when you have to grab a big gear change.

Wide handlebars are great but the ends need to be angled back (put a chop stick in each fist and hold your arms out straight: look at the angles the sticks make)
 
Back
Top