S synchronicity Senior Retro Guru Feb 19, 2023 #1 That there were this many "standards"... of direct mount chainrings. I thought they were all the same! Attachments Screenshot 2023-02-19 at 14-30-53 Direct Mount Interface - Direct_Mount_Interface.pdf.png 76.1 KB · Views: 34
That there were this many "standards"... of direct mount chainrings. I thought they were all the same!
ishaw Gold Trader GT Fan Feedback View Feb 19, 2023 #3 Got to love 'standard' standards. There's also the old Shimano version used on xtr, xt etc back in the 90s. I'm sure hope and Middleburn will have their own too.
Got to love 'standard' standards. There's also the old Shimano version used on xtr, xt etc back in the 90s. I'm sure hope and Middleburn will have their own too.
B BerthaPog Retrobike Rider Gold Trader Kona Fan Feedback View Feb 19, 2023 #5 synchronicity said: That there were this many "standards"... of direct mount chainrings. I thought they were all the same! Click to expand...
synchronicity said: That there were this many "standards"... of direct mount chainrings. I thought they were all the same! Click to expand...
Imlach 98+ BoTM Winner Feedback View Feb 19, 2023 #6 I personally believe that the pinnacle of biking was the time where a flathead screwdriver, a hammer and a flat plank was all you needed
I personally believe that the pinnacle of biking was the time where a flathead screwdriver, a hammer and a flat plank was all you needed
MattiThundrrr Kona Fan Feb 19, 2023 #7 Imlach said: I personally believe that the pinnacle of biking was the time where a flathead screwdriver, a hammer and a flat plank was all you needed Click to expand... So, pre titanium, or pre Alfine?
Imlach said: I personally believe that the pinnacle of biking was the time where a flathead screwdriver, a hammer and a flat plank was all you needed Click to expand... So, pre titanium, or pre Alfine?
Imlach 98+ BoTM Winner Feedback View Feb 19, 2023 #8 MattiThundrrr said: So, pre titanium, or pre Alfine? Click to expand... Shhhh