How much different can frames with the same geometry feel?

Re:

I'll be laughed at for saying it but I think I preferred my backwoods with less feel than my zaskar. Zaskar was notably harsher, actually a bit too harsh for me. Maybe I built it up as being a wonder bike in my head, but I was disappointed. Did 10 x more riding on the backwoods and didnt keep the zaskar long.
 
Re: Re:

coomber":1087pnvg said:
I'll be laughed at for saying it but I think I preferred my backwoods with less feel than my zaskar. Zaskar was notably harsher, actually a bit too harsh for me. Maybe I built it up as being a wonder bike in my head, but I was disappointed. Did 10 x more riding on the backwoods and didnt keep the zaskar long.

There's going to be a big interaction between frame, tyres, rider weight and strength, preferred pedaling frequency and frame size - they'll all alter perceived springiness. A 16" Zkr feels like a taut spring to me, but it's possible that I'd have been "meh" about an 18. And tube profile altered during production life, which alter springiness too - not to mention the eventual change to 7005. Someone made the brilliant point that joins have an affect on frame feel: there are a lot of variables. It's very possible that for you a Backwoods was right and a Zaskar was wrong.

This is possibly why the bike industry has never tried to sell planing as a feature - it gets too messy and rider particular.
 
Frame size is also why any decent frame maker will alter angles and even select different tubing, butt lengths and quite possibly a different style of tube between frame sizes. But a different mix of tubes (and not just butt lengths or wall thickness of the same brand/model) would probably be to your custom builders.


Anyway, so you going to test it, buy three bikes. (you only really need the frames so you can swap between them).
 
Back
Top