- Feedback
- View
From the research I have seen it may be possible that a thin helmet designed to rotate relative to the wearers head may well be able to reduce the incidence of brain injury in cycling accidents. However, it could not presently be sold because it would not pass the current impact tests. It is also possible that a bobble hat could provide more protection against sudden rotational accelerations and decelerations of the head than current helmet designs.
The question is what are the actual risks of banging the head hard versus the head being made to rotate or stop rotating suddenly? If the risk of the former is low, and the risk of the latter is high, then current helmet designs and standards have a big problem.
Some research, including the inspection of helmets after accidents, conclude that the foam was rarely, if ever, compressed as expected. This suggests that the dense foam currently used is too stiff and so not in fact protecting the brain. This is born out by instances where the helmets of brain damaged victims are not damaged.
Only through a thorough understanding of what causes brain damage can effective solutions be identified. These solutions may in fact be very simple. Even a elastic net stretched over a current helmet would stop it from suddenly gripping the ground. Maybe even a spray on coating? But it is the regulators of helmets that need to get the facts straight. Only then can we have new test standards based on hard nosed science, and not the current finger in the air style guesswork.
The question is what are the actual risks of banging the head hard versus the head being made to rotate or stop rotating suddenly? If the risk of the former is low, and the risk of the latter is high, then current helmet designs and standards have a big problem.
Some research, including the inspection of helmets after accidents, conclude that the foam was rarely, if ever, compressed as expected. This suggests that the dense foam currently used is too stiff and so not in fact protecting the brain. This is born out by instances where the helmets of brain damaged victims are not damaged.
Only through a thorough understanding of what causes brain damage can effective solutions be identified. These solutions may in fact be very simple. Even a elastic net stretched over a current helmet would stop it from suddenly gripping the ground. Maybe even a spray on coating? But it is the regulators of helmets that need to get the facts straight. Only then can we have new test standards based on hard nosed science, and not the current finger in the air style guesswork.