ringo":3ga8zo6q said:No one has "claimed" anything... :
Please review. I am too lazy to cut and paste .
Also, not upset in the least bit, curious yes.
ringo":3ga8zo6q said:No one has "claimed" anything... :
sinnerman":2mgimpgj said:"an inquisitor is one who "searches out" or "inquires" by the way.
NeilM":23jiqel9 said:Maybe the critical and disbelieving attitudes shown by the inquisitors has led to OP to conclude that the questions don't deserve an answer.
MehNeilM":3rh7zz0w said:Maybe the critical and disbelieving attitudes shown by the inquisitors has led to OP to conclude that the questions don't deserve an answer.
hollister":26y4x33g said:If you and ringo are happy with with the blatant misinformation in this thread who am I to stand in your way?
If you and ringo are happy with with the blatant misinformation in this thread who am I to stand in your way?
Retrobikes loss
Wold Ranger":2lkwd4fu said:The frame came from the original RM shop in Vancouver, the lady owners name is actually painted on the frame under the top tube, as part of the original paint job. My claims are not "claims" but the frames true history, that I believe came from the original owner, by word of mouth, it may or may not be the exact truth, but who cares anyway? I certainly don't.
Back then, Tom did a lot of custom orders and not yet many production frames, this was one, they did not have a "name" Annapurna/Ascent/Commando/etc
ringo":2zxbmiz4 said:If you and ringo are happy with with the blatant misinformation in this thread who am I to stand in your way?
Retrobikes loss
Well bloody well tell us then - as a few people have now stated, we want more information...
I thought Californians were supposed to be chilled.