Mikey08
Kona Fan
So my bike is 2000 era from days before short stems and extended reach frames. Ive experimented with modern short stems and wider bars and overall I like the way it feels way better than what we used to ride back in the day. I tried a 40mm stem and it felt great on the downhills but kinda awkward on flat terrain and really bad on climbs. I ran a 70mm stem and that still gave me great steering while still being able to climb comfortably. I recently got a 60mm stem and for me this is the sweet spot, Im only 5'8" though so your mileage may vary.
In order to gain a little extra reach wile still retaining the steering characteristic's I like Im planning to run the stem with no spacers and bring the bar height back up using a higher rise bar. Were talking minimal reach gains here, id estimate about 5mm. I dont even know if this is going to make a noticeable difference. I could take this idea up a notch by running the stem upside down (its 7deg rise) and going for 40mm rise bars. Make sense?
The concept is that moving your stem up and down along the axis of the steerer tube is effectively changing the reach measurement of the bike. This also changes your bar height but different rise bars can compensate for this.
Thoughts?
In order to gain a little extra reach wile still retaining the steering characteristic's I like Im planning to run the stem with no spacers and bring the bar height back up using a higher rise bar. Were talking minimal reach gains here, id estimate about 5mm. I dont even know if this is going to make a noticeable difference. I could take this idea up a notch by running the stem upside down (its 7deg rise) and going for 40mm rise bars. Make sense?
The concept is that moving your stem up and down along the axis of the steerer tube is effectively changing the reach measurement of the bike. This also changes your bar height but different rise bars can compensate for this.
Thoughts?