TGR":146otneo said:
Interesting point about coffee vs beetroot, i didn't know that. I now wish i liked beetroot.
Well caffeine is "controlled" by the IOC in relation to it's performance enhancing benefits, and being above certain limits in the bloodstream. As far as I know, they're rather unconcerned about beetroot.
But different values apply to short events in comparison to endurance events - all the same, stimulants as well as other substances have long been used in endurance events - like le tour.
TGR":146otneo said:
I do want a stronger upper body and your pressup plan would work but i think i would have to actually work up to them! Neil has made similar points but he promotes weight training which i may try.
Just to clarify that point for anybody else reading, I don't blindly advocate weight lifting / training for everybody, it was more in relation to the bit in bold, really. Calisthenics, whether making them artificially harder, or otherwise, will improve some functional strength above a baseline, but after that, only increasing resistance improves strength, all other things being equal. A lot of the schemes I see in making calisthenics harder, or more of a challenge, sometimes comes with increased risk of injury, too.
Although I get the point, some of these exercise regimes are often based around not needing much, if anything, in terms of equipment.
Ultimately, the "best" exercise regime for an individual will come down to one that they don't hate, and perhaps derive some enjoyment of sense of achievement - ie one that they'll actually sustain - one that meets the goals they seek (which also may well change, as they improve), and presents least risk of injury (cross-fitters are you listening?)