There's an air of entitlement about it all.
Funny you should mention that.
He advertises his frame building course as '
an invitation to craft your own bicycle masterpiece', yet when I explained what I wanted out of the frame (a modern lugged all-rounder), he instead tried to direct me towards building something like the dedicated rim-brake randonneur in the shop window. As lovely as it was, I disagreed, after which his face changed and he started with subtle digs about bicycle mod-cons (e.g. disc brakes, thru-axles) and why they were unnecessary.
Either the course wasn't for me (and he could have sent me home the first day after discussing a custom frame built by him instead) or the course is taught as advertised.
Paul says in response to a comment in the posted YT vid that it isn't gate-keeping for the sake of it. Experiences as above leave you believing otherwise.
Its understandable that he got behind due to illness as a one man operation that offered frame building courses.
I
do wonder about that. There are so many variables/unknowns, though, that I prefer to give the benefit of the doubt. There's such a fine line between genuine criticism and cynicism that it's easy to stray into the latter.
At the risk of sounding like Tony Blair, all I'll say is: communication, communication, communication. Customers would be a lot more patient (and far less inclined to mistrust) if he didn't just ghost them for months/years.
I mean, even if you avoided a
really personal touch, how long would it take to come up with a generic e-mail merge from scratch? 10 minutes? 15, tops?