Early Saracen Lovers Anonymous......

dendy":28uwdcoq said:
oldave":28uwdcoq said:
Yep, the Bombers look great - but are they not too long for the Kili? I didn't think mine sat right even with 440 a to c Project 2s.

I suppose it depends on the year. 97 frames were made with 63mm travel in mind and 98/99 frames were made for 80mm travel.

Ah yes, but as We Are Stevo says, nice match. 8)

I'll see how it goes once it's built. These are 100mm forks and if I'm not happy then they will be replaced. Tbh though I don't expect it to be that much of an issue. I subscribe to Dr S' theory on this issue. :wink:
 
firedfromthecircus":170we4gu said:
dendy":170we4gu said:
oldave":170we4gu said:
Yep, the Bombers look great - but are they not too long for the Kili? I didn't think mine sat right even with 440 a to c Project 2s.

I suppose it depends on the year. 97 frames were made with 63mm travel in mind and 98/99 frames were made for 80mm travel.

Ah yes, but as We Are Stevo says, nice match. 8)

I'll see how it goes once it's built. These are 100mm forks and if I'm not happy then they will be replaced. Tbh though I don't expect it to be that much of an issue. I subscribe to Dr S' theory on this issue. :wink:

Yes, they look cool on the frame for sure 8)
 
Hello Saracen lovers, got a Tufftrax Elite which a guy at work has had for years. Not sure what year it is but looks exactly like the one in this catalogue shot

http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewto ... 5&start=15

Any help on the year and possiable worth, pretty much original from what I can tell. A little bit ruff but a nice bike. I will get some pics up in a tick just need to get them off my phone.

Cheers
 
Depends on condition! I paid 45 quid for mine - very good nick but shabby paint. Adding rack, panniers and 'grds brought it up to a £100. Cheapest bike I've ever owned - and I hardly ever ride any of my other 3 (all Saracens) any more.

TuftyComp2.jpg
 
ok here's the pics

not bad condition, needs a good clean
 

Attachments

  • 1.webp
    1.webp
    50.8 KB · Views: 707
  • 2.webp
    2.webp
    64.1 KB · Views: 707
  • 3.webp
    3.webp
    76.4 KB · Views: 707
  • 4.webp
    4.webp
    45.1 KB · Views: 707
Back
Top