Trek_Maniac
Dirt Disciple
Yeah, ok, if that is 20" it looks proportional to me
firedfromthecircus":bxjoh3j4 said:I'm 5'11" and I have a 20" Diamond Back Ascent EX from 1989. (actually 20.5" according to the catalogue)
Now for my height that is borderline too big, but I like a bigger frame. Some people would prefer an 18". I choose a 19" generally in Mountain bikes. If that frame is a 22" then I would definitely say it would be too big for me.
I include a picture of my DB set up as I ride it for reference. Not a great deal of seatpost showing.
millsm":3uv7dl21 said:That looks like it may be 20" - here's a pic of my 20" '92 Axis:
I'm 6'1" with a 34" inseam & it fits perfect. 20" seattube (center-to-top), 32" standover, 23.5" top tube, and a few inches of standover clearance. As for the price, it's pretty close to a steal, especially for the condition, full DX, etc. Here are a couple pics from the 1992 catalog for your reference: