Excellent, more discussion on Raleigh rather than jibber jabber!
The name....ok, I'll leave it
Interesting point. I think for most it would perhaps work the opther way.
To add something else to the discussion I think my view of Raleigh as 'cool' has perhaps been revised over time. As a yoof in the early 90s Raleigh were uncool to me through their association to the chaff despite the exploits of Baker, Alexander, Tomac et al. Now I'm just out of my teens (or somesuch) and have a broader understanding of the brand (inc heritage and history) as a whole I'd go with cool.
MikeD":1grz3636 said:Some Raleigh USAs were still produced in Nottingham even prior to the Derby group buyout.Further I seem to recall Raleigh UK distributing Techniums in the early 90s. Whilst they are certainly seperate I would perhaps argue the relationship is somewhat closer than GT and whoever, esp given the commonality of Derby.
"Distributing" is exactly that - a manufacturer/distributor relationship. Raleighs US and UK are no closer than Raleigh and Diamondback ;-)
Aaaaaanyway. I think that one's pretty much kicked to death. I shall move on.
The name....ok, I'll leave it
MikeD":1grz3636 said:To me, the general lack of coolness of Raleigh is what makes the Baker-era team bikes far more cool than they would otherwise be. Does that make sense?
Interesting point. I think for most it would perhaps work the opther way.
To add something else to the discussion I think my view of Raleigh as 'cool' has perhaps been revised over time. As a yoof in the early 90s Raleigh were uncool to me through their association to the chaff despite the exploits of Baker, Alexander, Tomac et al. Now I'm just out of my teens (or somesuch) and have a broader understanding of the brand (inc heritage and history) as a whole I'd go with cool.