IWish":2gedi9tg said:So I'm looking at buying a new bike. Something I can live with all the time.
Russell":3m12jryj said:I can find numerous examples of broken titanium 456 frames, including at least one on this forum.
I've been unable to find one broken carbon 456.
Considering it is so less resilient and more fragile, thats odd... don't you think?
highlandsflyer":1n9nt2tk said:Russell":1n9nt2tk said:I can find numerous examples of broken titanium 456 frames, including at least one on this forum.
I've been unable to find one broken carbon 456.
Considering it is so less resilient and more fragile, thats odd... don't you think?
So we can assume that your subjective analysis overrides a general consensus?
I was not referring to specific frames, was I?
Now make a valid comparison if you can.
Jeez.
AndyPA":gqszjcrg said:I spray a lot of carbon frames and I can honestly say from experience after a seasons use they look battered compared to steel and Titanium
Neil G":3ayyqdqk said:AndyPA":3ayyqdqk said:I spray a lot of carbon frames and I can honestly say from experience after a seasons use they look battered compared to steel and Titanium
Yep, had some Noir carbon cranks and they looked s**t even after a few muddy rides.
Carbon 456 newer than the Ti version so surely impossible to compare the breakages of the two.
Personally I'd save up and go high end steel over either.