BoTM April 2014 **VOTE NOW**

[yeti-man]

:facepalm:

 

[raidan73]

:facepalm:

I meant that honestly! It was a genuine contender for me personally but isn't the kind of bike I would have expected to hold it's own against some of the mint examples (and more than 50% of the contenders) in a BotM competition.

 

[sinnerman]

:facepalm:

Honestly......, Wasn't that the third time you entered that bike in this comp anyway........???

 

[ridevintagemtb]

That Yates is sweet. Congrats

 

[Mike Muz]

:facepalm:

Honestly......, Wasn't that the third time you entered that bike in this comp anyway........???

Your avatar doesn't make the hair stand up on the back of my neck now !

Well done Gio , lovely bike

 

[Giom6]

Re:

Wow :shock: That came as a bit of shock.

Thanks to everybody who voted

 

[yeti-man]

:facepalm:

Honestly......, Wasn't that the third time you entered that bike in this comp anyway........???

- so what?




#16 @ http://www.retrobike.co.uk/wiki/BoTM_Rules

 

[sinnerman]

:facepalm:

Honestly......, Wasn't that the third time you entered that bike in this comp anyway........???

- so what?




#16 @ http://www.retrobike.co.uk/wiki/BoTM_Rules

Mmmmmmmmmm, Rule 15.
http://www.retrobike.co.uk/wiki/BoTM_Rules

Or has the rule book been thrown away for fellas like you..., As others has suggested...?

 

[sinnerman]

:facepalm:

Honestly......, Wasn't that the third time you entered that bike in this comp anyway........???

- so what?




#16 @ http://www.retrobike.co.uk/wiki/BoTM_Rules

In short your bike wasn't even eligible to be in the comp, and several votes were wasted.

And to be fair it isn't the first time either.

Never mind.

 

[highlandsflyer]

Re:

I would have voted for the winner had Yeti's machine not tickled me.

Can anyone explain in dullard's terms why restricting the number of entries is beneficial?