Re: Re:
I've not done it myself, but have converted a few bikes either from hydro to mech, or just built them with mech.
Reasons are usually around field servicability and/or cost/availability. i.e. before drop bar hydros were widely available.
Done a couple of CX bikes and a three or four long distance tourers (flat bar and drop) one of the tourers was planning to ride from Sweden to Turkey then possibly across into Egypt, North Africa and the fact that he could pick up a brake cable inner/outer in pretty much any town or village between here and there was the deciding factor, plus the fact that the fitted pads would last him the entire tour! Getting shimano hydros fixed is another matter altogether. So that's a plus.
He only got to Italy in the end.
CassidyAce":3otbbk05 said:
Reasons: ease of adjustment to suit how I want them to feel
Yup, you have to spend a lot of money on hydros to get that level of adjustability and "fettleability"
Rotorhead":3otbbk05 said:
Try as I might I still can’t get it to work as well as the V on the rear. It’s better than the Diatech crap though. Different ball park to hydraulic discs.
TBH, the set up on mech discs is absolutely critical, there is so little motion in the pads and no sort of self adjustment feature as per hydros that if you don't get it spot on you'll never get it right. TBH, you *can* get them almost as good as hydros, but the amount you need to spend, it's probably cheaper to just buy hydros. I've resorted to all sorts of tricks to get them right. Biggest one is getting the best outers you can and being incredibly precise with every stage of cutting, cleaning up, routing and fitting. (cutting with a dremel slicing disc to get the ends at 90 degrees, reaming out and flaring the liner, doing a complete set up and bed in, then readjusting everything to take out any slop. And so on.)