Any female members out there?

CAS":opxo5jih said:
I acquired this bike from one of the moderators of this forum who happens to be a work colleague. I didn't give any thought to the age of the Spesh when I bought it

If your 'moderator work colleague' is who I think I'd be very careful about using abreviations like Spesh! :LOL:

Good to see that the site is attracting more female members, and it would be great to see more riding at meets.

Kneedowndean brought his girlfriend/wife to Cannock last winter and she taught quite a few of the lads how to ride a bike. In fact I don't recall her falling off even once :oops: :oops:
 
OldSchoolGirly":mtjso3j9 said:
I'm very sensible at the moment due to lack of finances, but I've had a fair few cars... last one was a one off MKIV Supra TT6.

http://www.facebook.com/album.php?aid=2 ... =514110322

Porsche 911 (965 probably...) is somewhere high on my list next... Old school again... there is a pattern forming here!! Fair way off that though, stupid mortgage!!

Nice. I am a Rover person, got a Rover Turbo at the moment. Quite quick :)
 
m-trax":2k5id602 said:
Anthony":2k5id602 said:
Notwithstanding all that, I am a bit surprised by what you say, as (a) Dawes is a good brand and I’d be surprised if they’d got the geometry wrong, (b) most female-specific bikes are short in the top tube, because it’s held that women need a slightly-upright riding posture as they’re anatomically-prone to bad backs (albeit not all women are the same of course), and (c) if you’re falling off the back of the saddle, it means it’s way too short for you, not just the usual inch or whatever. It kind of sounds as though you’re just not comfortable on the bike in general. But then, what do I know?

You could post up a side-on photo of it though.

It is a 16" frame, and I am about 5ft 7 from memory. It used to be ok when I first got it, but not now :? I will get some pics up of it

Hi Anthony

Well I have measured mine tonight, looks like my memory must be failing me.

I measured 17" from the top of the frame to about the middle of the bottom bracket. 55cm from the centre to centre along the top tube, and 56cm horizontally.

I do have the seat tube set to about its maximum point.

I will try and grab a pic at the weekend.
 
m-trax":121ojh38 said:
Hi Anthony
Well I have measured mine tonight, looks like my memory must be failing me.
I measured 17" from the top of the frame to about the middle of the bottom bracket. 55cm from the centre to centre along the top tube, and 56cm horizontally.
I do have the seat tube set to about its maximum point.
I will try and grab a pic at the weekend.
OK, well if you're 5-7 and the bike is a size 17 then it should be about the right size for you. Those measurements are a fraction on the short side for a size 17, but really only a cm or so. And when you compare that to (a) the difference between a straight seat post and a layback seat post, say 3cm, (b) the amount of adjustment on the saddle rail, say 5cm, and (c) the difference between a short stem and a long one, say 4cm, then a cm or so on the frame shouldn't be such a big deal.

So maybe it's something else that's causing the problem. You say the seat's at its maximum height (I assume you mean the seat post is quite short), so is the saddle high enough for you? I've found sometimes that having the saddle too low can promote sitting too far back, which is a very bad thing. You need the saddle high enough so that your leg is slightly bent with the pedal at its lowest. This gives you the most powerful pedalling position, the easiest transition to getting out of the saddle and a position if anything in fact towards the front of the saddle - to facilitate using your weight in helping to push the pedals down.

Another possibility that could explain you feeling cramped is that the stem might be too short or high for you? If it's say a 9cm high-rise stem, the bike would feel much roomier with say an 11cm low-rise. And again of course that would shift your weight forward, which is the powerful position. But not *too* far forward of course, or your wrists will ache!

There are other factors like the height of the bars, but really it's just a matter of adjusting things such as the seat post and stem to get your weight nicely balanced, not too far back, not too far forward. It's surprising sometimes what short bikes some powerful riders use, but by riding high, getting out of the saddle frequently and keeping the weight right above the pedal stroke, they don't feel cramped at all.

I hope this isn't missing the point. Maybe you need a new bike, but trying some cheap things first like a longer post or stem is a lot cheaper than buying a new bike, and actually if that's the nature of the problem then a new bike maybe wouldn't solve it anyway.

Do send a pic of the Dawes though.
 
m-trax":38yh8xq7 said:
I will try and grab a pic at the weekend.

Pic of my bike

2935429402_b407995e70_o.jpg
 
m-trax":xr04sdkf said:
Pic of my bike
And very nice too.

I feel sure that bike with that set up is nowhere near being too small for the average rider of 5-7. That looks like a 13cm stem and the seat looks quite high enough, so both of my prognostications above bite the dust ignominiously. Anyway I'll pm you a few further thoughts on the set up, as this may be getting a bit ad hominem for a forum discussion.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top