Anti-Hope- Rant.

Re:

Yeah but that £730 today would get you 6-8" of air spring travel.
Call it £200 per inch of travel, both back then, and now.
So £/inch nothing has changed ;)
 
LOL, the forks on my ex wifes new bike retail at €1300 (can buy them for €950) and have 120mm of travel.

The ones on my race bike are €1100, can't be bought on significant discount anywhere (i found them with €50 off in one place) and only have 100mm.

On the flip side, the complete bike costs less than the RRP of the frame, fork and wheels.

So i'll be buying all my future bike parts as complete bikes and stripping them down ;)
 
Re:

So just to recap Dyna.

All Hope stuff is now crap because a plastic tube, that by your own admission you stole, doesn’t fit the new bleed nipples?

Overreaction perhaps?
 
Re:

Looking at this from another angle I've just binned my Sram DB5's, both broke an unobtainable piece of plastic inside the lever. The third (a replacement broke too). My umpteen year old Hopes just keep working.
 
Re: Re:

shedobits":3asxeekc said:
Looking at this from another angle I've just binned my Sram DB5's, both broke an unobtainable piece of plastic inside the lever. The third (a replacement broke too). My umpteen year old Hopes just keep working.

Well make sure you have all the tools just in case you decide to modernize :LOL:

But is there somewhere a thread with someone else getting pelters for daring to question the all knowing and almighty Sram :shock: Talking about how annoying Sram are with their flimsy mechs..... :LOL: ;)

Clubby in, must be quiet in MacR.

No need to recap anything bud, Just a member airing an opinion. Nothing to see, more along now.
 
Re: Re:

thirteen":hawcmvoi said:
There are people who actually believe that the slacker the head angle, the better a bike climbs.
No one believes that, unless they haven't been paying attention. Or they are being quoted out of context.

thirteen":hawcmvoi said:
And they get REALLY annoyed when you point out that millions (billions? :? ) of years of evolution fly in the face of such a thing and indeed - would suggest that being more upright is a far more efficient method of moving uphill :shock:
On a frame with modern geometry/forks/set up, you will be more upright then you would have been 10 years ago.

This was discussed some months ago, where someone was finding it very difficult to set their new bike up in the same way as their old bike. And get comfortable.
 
Re: Re:

thirteen":iq2276i2 said:
I still maintain that bleed nipple is a shocker :|

Never buy modern SRAM brakes then. They didn’t even have a bleed nipple :shock:
 
Re:

As for the great axle debate, I both agree and disagree!
Definitely a need on modern bikes for thru axles. It’s just that competing manufacturers have ballsed it up with too many options. Thankfully diameter has settled at 12mm but there are 3 different thread types for the screw in axles depending on frame makers. That’s just stupid.
The thru axles are also the reason for Hope keeping updating their hubs. On Pro 2 and 2 Evo they were getting a lot of broken axles. Making everything a little bigger on the Pro 4 allowed them to make the axle a lot stronger. So while yes no-one will notice the performance difference of a bigger ratchet ring, it will be less likely to break.

I’m with everyone on the chaos that is bottom brackets though :LOL:
 
Back
Top