I have both and as yet not competed or ridden either but am contemplating moving one of them on as they are similar frames, but to help me decide, what are the real differences/pros and cons for each?
The Amplifier has the dual down tube design and what seems to me slightly more rudimentary bolts/fastenings for the suspension pivots.
The B3 has a solid down tube, and I've a couple of risse shocks rather than the standard coil shock.
After a new powder coat and decals for the Amplifier, it's fitted with m900, cooks, onza ho brakes and control tech finishing kit, and the B3 is unbuilt but I was planning an m737/9 xt build.
Whatever I do, I can obviously swap parts as necessary but I want to keep the better bike, but how do I judge which one is?
The Amplifier has the dual down tube design and what seems to me slightly more rudimentary bolts/fastenings for the suspension pivots.
The B3 has a solid down tube, and I've a couple of risse shocks rather than the standard coil shock.
After a new powder coat and decals for the Amplifier, it's fitted with m900, cooks, onza ho brakes and control tech finishing kit, and the B3 is unbuilt but I was planning an m737/9 xt build.
Whatever I do, I can obviously swap parts as necessary but I want to keep the better bike, but how do I judge which one is?