So based on your blinkered view of the modern world, it would be difficult to state what was real and what was not. Rolls Royce being a prime example, which section of Rolls Royce could be considered the real one?
The same question could be applied to Bontrager, Gary Fisher, Le Mond, Raleigh, Pace, et-al.
Then when a company isn't bought out, but simply moves premises, what then, no longer real?
So, BMW Motorad, Triumph, Ducati, Moto Guzzi, Fiat, are all not real, yet I've owned or currently own what appear to be real motorcycles, with those actual names on them.
Taking this further and using your basis of argument, Harley Davidson, became non real when they moved out of the shed and into a new premises, yet the original owners and designers were still in charge?
Following your "logic" Raleigh stopped being real when, as they changed owner but were made in the same factory? I revert to your Volvo answer which also suggests that you believe a Klein made in its original factory can still be a Klein no matter who the parent company is. Which ironically contradicts your original statement.
I'm guessing you'll argue that the world is flat, as that was the original theory, or perhaps the moon is made from cheese, and mountain bikes are only mountain bikes if made by Tom Ritchie?