Tazio":2s2j6cvm said:By making it comfortable and able to be ridden by him? That isn't killing it but making it usable and extending it's life, it's a bike not a museum piece.
I couldn't agree more.
Tazio":2s2j6cvm said:By making it comfortable and able to be ridden by him? That isn't killing it but making it usable and extending it's life, it's a bike not a museum piece.
Tazio":pbzaqzzj said:By making it comfortable and able to be ridden by him? That isn't killing it but making it usable and extending it's life, it's a bike not a museum piece.
Robbied196":2uwh1b4k said:Tazio":2uwh1b4k said:By making it comfortable and able to be ridden by him? That isn't killing it but making it usable and extending it's life, it's a bike not a museum piece.
Just trying to add a constructive criticism. I agree its far better that the bike is used and not intended as a museum piece. But it can just as easily be made fully functional and fully usable with more suitable period components. IMO it would make a great improvement to the look of the bike.
BUT, its entirely up to Mr Panda, that's just my two' penneth
Mr Panda":1k3wsv52 said:Everything I do is reversible and all original components are secure in an airtight box
Original bars were just plain too narrow for my comfort so they were swapped for what I had lying around. Original Brooks saddle will go back on at some point but that Spoon is COMFY.
Original tyres were SOLID rubber - Jeez, no way, although I'm not convinced 700c wheels suit the bike :? Might revert to larger originals.
Gearing - staying at 7 speed for the time being although I do want and alloy crankset soon.
When I was growing up in the 60s most riders were customising their bikes in some manner to suit local terrain or personal tastes. I'm no exception. Once I get the setup spot on (for me) I'll consider repaint options :twisted: