Recent content by torqueless

  1. torqueless

    Ten years later...

    Well.. this is interesting.. just been to the Stan Pike website and seen the ex John Woodburn K77069R over there, complete with a photo of the serial number on the bracket shell, a ringer for what mine used to look like, before the shell was replaced. A few years back I was futilely exploring...
  2. torqueless

    Tom Avon

    What would we do without dads and their tobacco tins eh? This one is 1/4" BSF too..🙂
  3. torqueless

    Mystery Peugeot

    You could also try PMing bduc61 on here, our (erstwhile?) resident Frenchman- dunno if he's still around.. he has some great threads on French stuff, back in the archives too..🙂
  4. torqueless

    Mystery Peugeot

    I'll be honest- almost anything I know about Bertins comes from Jim's site- and with the proviso that I don't know whether the features that suggest to me that this is a Bertin are unique to Bertin, or were widespread among French builders.. here is the evidence: 1)Bertins are documented as...
  5. torqueless

    Mystery Peugeot

    You probably need to abandon hope of 'definitive'. Just over three years ago I identified this to you on here as likely being a Bertin cyclocross...probably early '70s. I probably should have done so without the sarcasm... (story of my life.) The people who could give you a definitive answer...
  6. torqueless

    Mid Eighties E.G Bates Tourer

    I disagree. 80s Holdsworth Special is just like this, (lugs apart) using the same fork crown and bb shell. I don't think those 'pantographed' top-eyes were in evidence on British frames before the '80s, or at least the late '70s?
  7. torqueless

    1980 Brian Rourke

    I don't know how much lighter SL was than DB, but fwiw I have a 23" c-t 531db frame which weighs 2075g, the forks weigh 750g- more or less 6lb all in, in old money.
  8. torqueless

    Clive Stuart Cycles

    👍
  9. torqueless

    Clive Stuart Cycles

    You should probably remove the 'h' from 'Whitcomb' in the text on your homepage though, curyam. Whitcomb was a contemporaneous Liverpool framebuilder with no business connection (afaik) to Witcomb in Deptford Sarf London..
  10. torqueless

    70's skateboards

    Sorry I don't remember a board called "Red" anything! I was fortunate(?) enough to be able to get myself to Alpine Sports at the time.. could barely afford anything in there though.. turned out I was crap at skateboarding anyway..🙂
  11. torqueless

    70's skateboards

    Try searching for "flyer" skateboard.
  12. torqueless

    New bikes are Huuuge! Zaskar trigger warning!

    It's a bit academic these days. From memory, apart from uphill, It's where I psych myself up to stretch to the hoods, deluding myself that I'm going fast enough that I might need to apply the brakes..🙂
  13. torqueless

    New bikes are Huuuge! Zaskar trigger warning!

    We seem to be at communicational loggerheads. I say 'tops'.. you say 'yes just to the hoods'. That's about 5cm different... and the not-so-subtle sub-text of my post was that bike fit hasn't come any way at all in forty+ years. Why would it?.🙂
  14. torqueless

    New bikes are Huuuge! Zaskar trigger warning!

    Yeah but road bikes with drop bars have three distinct hand positions- tops, hoods and drops. Which are you measuring to? Fwiw both my bikes (mtb 30+ years old & road bike 40+ years old) measure up pretty close to this 'rad' thing. (if road bike is measured to tops.)
  15. torqueless

    70s Holdsworth Cyclone

    There's a thread currently on page 8 of 'Retro Classic Road' sub-forum here. If you post your frame number there dwscrimshaw might give you his opinion as to which year your frame was built. There will be date-codes on components as well, assuming they are original equipment? A nice frame, which...
Back
Top