Late last year my son purchased a 1995 Trek 5200 Carbon road bike with my blessing. I'm more of a lugged steel guy but my son was smitten with the nice carbon lines and amazing red/copper paint, he also likes vintage rigs. Full 600 tricolor components are nice too.
I don't have a pic of the actual bike handy, here is a screen shot of the same bike from the 95' catalogue:
My question is with the very slim and beautiful carbon fork. I realize Trek was aiming to appease the roadie crowd of the day and ensure it looked the same as a steel fork but it is very, very flexible.
I'm talking under hard front braking, the fore/aft movement can be pretty unnerving when I have taken it out for test rides.
At this point I'm mostly concerned with possible failure (29 year old carbon). I will probably push him to swap for a period steel fork but he plans to get out this weekend and start putting some miles in. He will be a pretty tame rider though. No crazy downhills I'm sure.
Does anyone know the reputation of this fork? Prone to failure or just very flexible?
Thanks for any helpful feedback
I don't have a pic of the actual bike handy, here is a screen shot of the same bike from the 95' catalogue:
My question is with the very slim and beautiful carbon fork. I realize Trek was aiming to appease the roadie crowd of the day and ensure it looked the same as a steel fork but it is very, very flexible.
I'm talking under hard front braking, the fore/aft movement can be pretty unnerving when I have taken it out for test rides.
At this point I'm mostly concerned with possible failure (29 year old carbon). I will probably push him to swap for a period steel fork but he plans to get out this weekend and start putting some miles in. He will be a pretty tame rider though. No crazy downhills I'm sure.
Does anyone know the reputation of this fork? Prone to failure or just very flexible?
Thanks for any helpful feedback